▲Incident with Actions and Pages(githubstatus.com)
73 points by hakube 7 hours ago | 8 comments
▲mimsee 7 hours ago
Apparently they deleted the Github Actions account as it shows up as ghost in PR comments.
▲rschiavone 6 hours ago
if that's the case, such a thing is so absurd that it goes around and it becomes almost hilarious
▲this_user 5 hours ago
I would love to know how much of their internal workflows are being handled by AI workflows. Because this seems like the kind of thing your agent might do.
▲DoctorDabadedoo 5 hours ago
The team got greenlight to more tokens and the problem should be fixed soon. Fingers crossed. /s

source: voices in my head. Not affiliated with MSFT.. anymore.

▲wg0 2 hours ago
I think Anthropic should buy Github after buying bun and everything in between.
▲FelipeCortez 2 hours ago
so they can rewrite it in Rust?
▲BrunoBernardino 5 hours ago
If you don't want to self-host Gitea/Forgejo, I recommend SourceHut for private repos and Codeberg for public ones. Happy to answer any questions you might have for either based on my experience!
▲packetlost 2 hours ago
For private repos I just have a folder on my NAS that I run `mkdir <repo name> && git -C <repo name> init --bare` in. Works great.
▲paularmstrong 4 hours ago
What's wrong with codeberg for private repos?
▲pdpi 3 hours ago
They only allow private repos as an exception, and only insofar as they're ancillary to open source projects.

From their FAQs[0]:

> Codeberg's mission is to promote free/libre software. Keeping software private is obviously not our primary use case, but we acknowledge that private repositories are useful or necessary at times.

0. https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/

▲fatterypt 1 hour ago
I'm more than happy with https://codefloe.com for private repos. The service is blazing fast and the maintainer does a great job keeping it up-to-date with recent Forgejo releases.
▲ 7 hours ago
▲ 6 hours ago
▲AntonyGarand 5 hours ago
Other post: GitHub Actions down again today [0]

Technically this one was earlier but the other one has more traction.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278374

▲tux3 7 hours ago
Over the last 90 days the status page (https://www.githubstatus.com/) shows around 2 nines of uptime for most services.
▲jbreckmckye 26 minutes ago
"We need an SCM with five nines of availability. What about GitHub?"

"Well. It's got a nine in it"

"What's the availability??"

"Nine percent"

▲rschiavone 6 hours ago
The Missing GitHub Status Page (https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/) gives a better overview of their frequent outages.
▲voxic11 4 hours ago
at least enterprise is better https://us.githubstatus.com/posts/dashboard
▲Hamuko 7 hours ago
I trust that about as much as I trust Volkswagen's emissions numbers.
▲ 7 hours ago
▲suis_siva 2 hours ago
I commented on the other post, but GHA's awful reliability, ergonomics and performance have caused me to quit my job and work on https://harmont.dev.
▲gustavus 1 hour ago
Anyone else notice that the first/near top comment on every HackerNews post lately is someone saying something along the lines of "I had X problem so I went and started working on Y solution if you want to give it a look?"

I don't want to delve into it any further - but something about it seems incongruous. It's not spam it's submarine marketing.

▲suis_siva 11 minutes ago
Ah sorry! Didn't mean to be annoying. Hm is open-source and my intentions are good. I'm also trying to figure out what's good and what's not!

Apologies for the spam!

▲ceejayoz 1 hour ago
Same thing's all over Reddit, too.
▲weakfish 1 hour ago
I mean, it is a community that self-selects for builders and startup-types.