Dithering with CSS(ikesau.co)
35 points by speckx 3 days ago | 8 comments
tiborsaas 10 minutes ago
This is CSS dithering with "SVG backend" doing the heavy lifting by utilizing the feComposite filter

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Reference/E...

tnelsond4 7 minutes ago
If we could get jbig2 native support in browsers we could do monochrome black and white images at ridiculously small file sizes.

A page of sheet music can be as small as 8kb. I'm using a wasm decoder right now, but I could forsee using css filters after the fact to make it look less sharp and aliased

rpastuszak 40 minutes ago
I’ve messed with a similar idea here: https://untested.sonnet.io/notes/just-some-innocent-gradient...

(The linked web app doesn’t work on mobile in portrait mode, sorry!)

The biggest issue with this trick is that different engines calculate the filters differently, thus turning an okay-ish image into something that looks like a glitch.

nextlevelwizard 2 hours ago
Is this actually dithering?

I have dabbled with some dithering algorithms and while this is way faster than my naive js implementations, this looks pretty bad

IshKebab 34 minutes ago
Yes it is dithering. Unusual dithering though - I don't see why it is coloured. Is this intended for printers?
heftig 18 minutes ago
The image gets de-saturated but the noise that's mixed in is colored. This looks like a mistake.

I think the noise is also way too 'soft'. At high frequencies it just becomes near-uniform gray so it barely affects the thresholding.

ramon156 2 hours ago
Is this what they use at schools before they hand it over to the printer? /j
skrebbel 32 minutes ago
I recommend lookscanned.io if you need a similar effect for legal reasons
marvinblum 1 hour ago
Exactly what I thought. Work sheets used to look like this if they have been copies of copies of copies...
kelsolaar 2 hours ago
It feels and looks like threshold-quantized Perlin rather than actual proper dithering. Cool stuff that said!
binaryturtle 2 hours ago
I have to admit I don't think it's visually very appealing like that. It looks more like some sort of error/ glitch. Maybe my old Firefox does it weirdly?
AntiUSAbah 1 hour ago
The image quality is so bad, I don't get it?