745 points by mihau 16 hours ago | 36 comments
tedggh 15 hours ago
I got a walkie talkie set as a Christmas present when I was 8. Which was kind of an evil thing to do given I had no siblings or friends to play with. One day I turned one set on and listened for a while and I thought I heard someone talking behind all the static noise. So I said something and was shocked to hear the voice talking back to me. Fast forward a few decades, next week is my wedding and that voice on the other side of the radio is my best man.
mtlynch 15 hours ago
Congrats! That's such a cool story!

>Fast forward a few decades, next week is my wedding and that voice on the other side of the radio is...

I think I've seen too many rom-coms because I was sure this sentence going to end with "my fiance." : )

ikari_pl 12 hours ago
Ten years ago I proposed to my best friend.

She said no.

brokenmachine 7 hours ago
Are you still friends?
0xf8 9 hours ago
Plot Twist AF… you could be a writer
pugworthy 8 hours ago
My dad was a HAM (W7AAI) and as a kid I found the frequencies for walkie talkies on his receiver in the shack. After Christmas I would tune in and hear local kids doing the "I can hear you, can you hear me?" thing with the new presents.
parpfish 14 hours ago
my family had a little portable TV (GE 7-7150B, link below) that we'd usually only use down in the basement during severe weather.

one day I learned that you could tune in all sorts of non-TV frequencies. In particular, you could tune into any phone calls my neighbors were making on their wireless phones.

i loved that little tv and used it up until the conversion to digital OTA tranmissions.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4qYPLd8owc

brulard 15 hours ago
I expected the voice on the other side being your soon-to-be wife. But good story nevertheless. Congrats!
waltbosz 1 hour ago
I thought the same thing. But it does happen, my neighbors started dating and eventually married after meeting over ham radio.
noman-land 3 hours ago
Awesome story and well told
fullstop 15 hours ago
This is awesome, and future congratulations on your wedding!
ghurtado 13 hours ago
damn, that's awesome.. I feel like I just watched the opening scene of a nice "stand by me" type movie.
behnamoh 15 hours ago
This is awesome, and congratulations!
thenobsta 15 hours ago
I got chills reading this. Congrats!
mrgriscom 10 hours ago
SDR is amazing!

Here are some more things you can do with your RTL-SDR after the first 50:

Meteor weather satellite reception (Russian counterpart of the NOAA satellites, but digital, so higher res and in color)

Digital Radio Mondiale -- digital radio but for shortwave

Analog TV -- if you're in an area that still broadcasts this (unlikely), you can receive a black & white picture and closed captioning. If no OTA broadcasts remain, you can use the analog output of a VCR or DVD player

GPS -- rtlsdr is capable of decoding GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou! (Likely not GLONASS since each satellite uses a separate frequency, spreading the signal beyond the sdr's bandwidth)

Hidden secondary audio broadcasts inside FM radio (like the stereo audio hack, but using higher frequencies in the demodulated stream)

Brazilian outlaws and UHF pirates using open repeaters on US military satellites launched in the 70s

TEMPEST / "Van Eck phreaking" where you can remotely read a nearby screen due to leakage from the monitor or video cabling

Instrument landing system -- if you're near an airport you can tune to a runway's ILS frequency and see the signal change as you move from the left side of the runway to the right

Infrared remotes -- stick an IR photodiode in the antenna port and you can demodulate codes from remote controls

Passive radar -- Tune into a very narrowband signal like a VOR or ATSC pilot signal, set your decimation extremely high (i.e., trading bandwidth for dynamic range) and you can see nearby planes in the area from their doppler-shifted reflections of the main signal

matheusmoreira 10 hours ago
> Brazilian outlaws and UHF pirates using open repeaters on US military satellites launched in the 70s

This is still happening? I'm sorry but that's hilarious!

https://www.wired.com/2009/04/fleetcom/

megaloblasto 16 hours ago
Sadly, you can't really get NOAA satellite images any more. NOAA-15 and 19 were decommissioned August 19, 2025, and NOAA 18 was decommissioned in June. It's my understanding that you'll need a much more powerful antenna to get images from the new satellites. Still, SDR is great fun. It's incredible to realize that all this information is stored in electromagnetic waves and passing through us all the time.
firesteelrain 7 hours ago
You can buy the kit on Amazon for the GOES satellites. Pretty easy to do

https://a.co/d/d7pCLGd

coredog64 5 hours ago
About 24 years ago, I was working at Honeywell and they were pulling down data from the GOES satellites for use an a GA service. It required a giant satellite dish on the roof of the office building and a top-of-the-line (for the time) Pentium 4 for decoding.
egorfine 15 hours ago
I wonder what does it entail to have a NOAA satellite decommissioned? Is it just turned off or is it directed to fall down into a designated area in the Pacific?
megaloblasto 15 hours ago
They will continue to orbit for about 150 years, slowly falling towards earth until the drag from the atmosphere burns them up.

"Like many older satellites, the POES satellites do not have thrusters to support a controlled reentry into Earth’s atmosphere at the end of their mission life. Instead, once passivated, they are safely powered down, placed in a non-operational state, and left in a stable orbit. Without onboard propulsion or significant atmospheric drag at their current altitude, NOAA estimates they will remain in orbit for roughly 150 years before gradually reentering the atmosphere and disintegrating."[1]

[1] https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/legacy-orbit-noaa-decommiss...

egorfine 15 hours ago
It sucks they power it down
jandrese 14 hours ago
Probably to recover the frequency for a newer satellite. The spectrum they transmit on is quite scarce.
immibis 14 minutes ago
You have to have an antenna pointing at the satellite though. That's an additional layer of selectivity.
pbhjpbhj 13 hours ago
How locked down are they? Should I expect to see a hacker conference talk "how i revived a weather satellite"?

Maybe once they're turned off they're irrecoverable?

sephamorr 8 hours ago
There have been numerous issues in the past with 'dead' satellites waking back up and activating transmitters again, generally making a mess of the spectrum. Some satellites have pyro-fuses on the power lines from the solar arrays that are fired during passivation to make absolutely sure that the sat doesn't ever recharge and wakeup.
rajer 12 hours ago
egorfine 14 hours ago
Makes total sense, thank you
gmiller123456 15 hours ago
I depends on the orbit. The low Earth ones would usually be de-orbited and fall back to Earth. The geosychronous ones are usually just moved to a parking orbit out of the way to make room for more. If it's in a high but not very crowded orbit, they might just stop using it.
holografix 8 hours ago
Where can I find more info about this? Ie: type of antenna needed, etc?
7 hours ago
mmmlinux 13 hours ago
Oh that's too bad, I had done this in the past and it was good fun.
atourgates 14 hours ago
A few months ago when there was a lot of emergency services activity in my area and I didn't know why, I was reminded that no-one in my region is contributing a feed to Broadcastify.

I went down the tunnel of using SDR to recieve those transmissions, and share them online.

Then I went a bit further.

What if you could transcribe the broadcasts into something like a text feed? What if you could add location information somehow to monitor where things were going on in your region? Could you use AI to somehow organize the data into a more useful format?

What if this data was valuable? Maybe you could sell this as a service? Who would buy it? Public safety organizations? Hospitals? News organizations?

I spent a few days worth of freetime figuring out how you'd do someting like this, and got to a place where I figured it was conceptually possible.

Then somewhere in my googling, I stumbled across this site: http://citizen.com/ - and realized that someone had already turned my idea into what looks like a pretty mature product.

Ahh well. I'm sure my billion dollar idea will come later.

In the meantime, I'd still like to mess with SDR at least so I can know what's going on around me next time there's a fire or other public safety incident, before it gets reported on.

FredPret 13 hours ago
The fact that there's a mature product doing what you want to do is a good thing. It means there's a market for what you want that's large enough to sustain development.

You can easily distinguish yourself from Citizen by targeting a different demographic, different branding, different UX, interpreting the data in a different way.

Just look at how many businesses there are in any industry that deliver the same outcome for their customers but in a slightly different way.

What you're describing could be a really good news source giving live on-the-ground information to people.

dirkc 14 hours ago
I don't know about billion dollar ideas, but I encourage you to make a product even if something similar exists.

If you squint enough there is nothing new under the sun and chances are that you will take a very long time to find something that hasn't already been done!

But doing your own product does several things - you learn a lot, you position yourself for future success, you see future ideas differently. And maybe you're okay for something to not be a billion dollar idea and you can outlast a venture funded product.

Maybe I'm just projecting, because I've put of building something for such a long time!

atourgates 13 hours ago
I was joking about the billion dollar idea.

My actual "MVP" was some kind of automated neighborhood newsletter, that'd monitor emergency services radio traffic, and put together some kind of "here's what happened in your neighborhood" daily newsletter.

Maybe I could get it packaged in a hardware/software package that let anyone set one up in their neighborhood.

But I mostly got stuck in privacy concerns. I'm not sure it's a valuable public service to let people know that, for example, someone had a heart attack a few blocks over.

I did think about the scientific value of some kind of statistical database that process and recorded emergency services calls though. But mostly, my ideas for commercial and moral opportunities were half-baked at the point that I discovered citizen.

One of the technical challenges I came up against was finding transcription software that could semi-accurately transcribe UHF/VHF radio traffic. However, it looks like there's some progress that's been made there since I last checked: https://www.rtl-sdr.com/radiotransciptor-real-time-radio-spe...

toast0 13 hours ago
> But I mostly got stuck in privacy concerns. I'm not sure it's a valuable public service to let people know that, for example, someone had a heart attack a few blocks over.

In the moment, notifying people who know CPR and may be nearby and able to get to a nearby location and start CPR before emergency services arrives is the base of PulsePoint [1], which seems like a useful public service.

As a digest, yeah, I don't think any usefulness outweighs the invasion of privacy. Maybe just a count of health emergencies responded to for observing trends.

[1] https://www.pulsepoint.org/

SpicyUme 6 hours ago
The privacy concern is real and not something I'd want to think about too hard myself. One night I heard sirens and checked one of the local scanner type sites. I could hear enough about the call, and that combined with a record of previous calls to that address made me wonder if I really wanted that information. Maybe some obfuscation of the previous codes to the address would have been enough to reduce the feeling of knowing too much.

None of that is to say it isn't a good idea. I appreciate the ability to see roughly what is going on when I hear sirens. Even if the sites aren't always able to show the calls. I think highway patrol doesn't show up for me.

Royce-CMR 10 hours ago
I’d encourage you to pursue it. I remember the old @breakingnews on Twitter when it first started, people listening to police scanners and typing info-dense one liners on what they heard. To this day the best news service of my life (until someone bought it).

A real time, AI snips version for my area in a running feed would be amazing. There are lots of formats and use cases; and the info is already out there.

It’s a great idea. Don’t let citizen sway you away from it.

ghurtado 13 hours ago
> I encourage you to make a product even if something similar exists.

This is very good advice: we often give up on "great ideas" once we find that they have already been done.

But the vast majority of people we consider successful did not invent anything completely new, they just made a better kind of XYZ, sometimes not even that dramatically different. If you think about it, it's a much more logical path to success than expecting to be the next DaVinci.

callalex 13 hours ago
Citizen is really enshittified, so any alternative would be better. I don’t object to them charging for their service, but they use all kinds of predatory editorial tactics and push notifications and marketing copy to instill primal fear that your neighborhood is imminently burning down and you will get shot if you don’t subscribe to a higher tier of service from them. Crime is way down in the US but you really don’t feel that way when you are a subscriber/user of Citizen.
lifeinthevoid 13 hours ago
That was the vibe I was getting when visiting the site, they seem to understand fear pretty well. Stay away for your own mental health :-)
ComputerGuru 14 hours ago
I was informed maybe 7 or 8 years back that my electric company would be replacing my analog meter with a smart one and always intended to try and glean more information about my electric consumption habits from it. It took me a lot longer than I intended, but last year I finally bought an RTL-SDR in the hopes of being able to get realtime info from the meter. Unfortunately, it seems that it's not one of the ones that emits consumption info over ISM bands for consumption by household appliances (so far as I can tell) and I ended up only capturing info from TPMS sensors off of passing cars (which was cool, but not really what I was looking for).

Do note that if you purchase an RTL-SDR these days, you'll probably get a v4 which, at least as of last year, does not play out-of-the-box at all with the software available on the Ubuntu apt repos and the RTL-SDR drivers that ship with 24.04 out-of-the-box — there were some hardware protocol/interface changes between v3 and v4 that make the old drivers incompatible and you'll get a litany of misleading or non-specific errors if you try without downloading and installing the latest drivers from GitHub (or somewhere).

fullstop 14 hours ago
Look into Rainforest Automation. I have their EMU-2 which can be paired with my electric meter. It spits out XML data which can be read by Home Assistant.

https://www.rainforestautomation.com/rfa-z105-2-emu-2-2/

esseph 12 hours ago
I have a v5 and have had no issues with Fedora 42 btw. Worked out of the box.

When I was installing it I actually came across the Ubuntu installation notes only to find I didn't need to do any of those things on my systems.

dtgriscom 9 hours ago
> capturing info from TPMS sensors off of passing cars

... sitting on a porch, yelling "Check your tires!" at random cars...

vel0city 14 hours ago
A number of smart meters communicate over the mains wires, especially when they're in very sparse areas. There was even a thought for a bit to offer internet services over the power distribution cables, but I don't think they ever really got effective data rates high enough to be competitive.
extraduder_ire 1 hour ago
If it's low enough bitrate, wouldn't you be able to read that by putting an antenna or loop of wire near the mains? I assume they use a documented standard.
ComputerGuru 14 hours ago
Yes, that seems to be what mine is doing as my ecobee thermostat is able to read info about peak usage times from the mains. I didn't know about the latter part though, I never imagined electric companies were making a play for the internet (though it seems like an obvious thought in retrospect).
esseph 11 hours ago
A lot of electric companies in the US are also ISPs. They already have most of the equipment to run fiber, and many also do wireless links between substations.
mdaniel 12 hours ago
And its "last mile" friend of using the in-wall cable as Ethernet drops, too, e.g. https://www.tp-link.com/us/powerline/ (but I don't think it holds a candle to actually pulling cat 5 or 6, for clarity)
blinry 10 hours ago
Heya, author here! This was such a fun project, and I'd really recommend the "Make 50 Things of Something" technique to everyone!

Also, I gave a 10-minute talk version of this post at !!Con last year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xic63tHw2Bo

bb88 12 hours ago
The paging system was unencrypted around here the last I looked (that was during covid). And there was software that could decode the transmissions. The SDR would easily pick it up.

One of the hospitals had been using it and would page people with PII -- including which people were in which room. So you could kinda see what was happening in the hospitals -- particularly during covid.

There kinda was a life cycle, seeing people admitted, O2 alerts firing off, and then the morgue being called to a room.

Overall, it was both interesting to have insight into something that you weren't ever going to be allowed to have access, and also very very sad.

ianburrell 4 hours ago
Listening to pagers is illegal in US from ECPA of 1986. It is the same law that banned listening to the analog cell frequencies, which still applies even thought that is long gone.

There is no way that they will know or care if you don't share messages.

drmpeg 9 hours ago
Same experience here with hospital pagers. I tried this way back in 2013 when I first started with SDR. Even without covid, the messages were hideous and depressing. Not recommended.
bsmeterhigh 12 hours ago
very unlikely. you may have read some text pages but not enough to get anywhere near the type of picture you're claiming.
zhala 2 hours ago
A few years ago I used an RTL-SDR to determine if I had a water leak since my meter is one that broadcasts over 900mhz (iirc). I wrote a small program to parse RTL-AMR output into Prometheus metrics (real life gauges are just like Prometheus gauges, who would've thought) and tracked it over a week while I was away on vacation. No leak luckily.

RTL-AMR: https://github.com/bemasher/rtlamr

EvanAnderson 15 hours ago
Receiving 433Mhz sensor data using rtl_433[0] with an RTL SDR was a lot of fun when I started doing it last year. There's MQTT output if you want to send it to Home Assistant, et. al., as well as simple text output to stdout. It was great fun seeing my neighbors' sensors, tire pressure sensors in passing vehicles, etc.

There a ton of devices that use 433Mhz. You can also extend rtl_433 pretty easily.

[0] https://github.com/merbanan/rtl_433

rpcope1 15 hours ago
A lot of the 433/915 band devices you can pick up with rtl_433 seem to be much more bullet proof and have longer battery life than equivalent WiFi and Zigbee devices too. Building new protocol decoders for rtl_433 also surprisingly isn't too bad either. One of my favorite ones is the water meter decoder which has saved me a lot of money when I've had irrigation water leaks and not noticed them (but saw conspicuous usage patterns reported).
jdc0589 12 hours ago
ive got ~15 deployed sensors/transmitters and I haven't touched a single one in 14 months since initial setup. its super reliable if you can get your receiver/antenna somewhere that works well.

WAY cheaper than the other options too.

fullstop 15 hours ago
I was hoping to find more devices around me which use 433. Apparently my neighbors don't have any 433MHz devices.
EvanAnderson 15 hours ago
I'm spoiled. One of my receivers is on a second story and has great line-of-sight to a bunch of houses and a parking lot (where I assume I get a lot of my TPMS "hits").
fullstop 15 hours ago
I was able to read some data from my electric meter, but the good stuff is encrypted.

What I was _really_ hoping to read was my water meter. It transmits so infrequently, though, so it's hard get much of anything or even know if you're successfully receiving something more than noise.

avh02 43 minutes ago
I've been going down this rabbit hole, there are two alternative options if you're looking for a side project, 1 is "ai on the edge" (Google it it's a pretty cool project), which is basically an esp32 + camera that takes a photo of your meter on a regular basis and OCRs the data, option 2 is (and I'll be trying this this week) to get a magnetometer hooked up to an esp32 to read the little magnetic pulses the impeller (in my case) makes (which is how the meter hardware they have reads it anyway), can have calibration difficulties but will be so cheap, there are also existing esphome projects for this.
fauria 6 hours ago
I can highly recommend the book Practical SDR if you want to learn about SDR: https://nostarch.com/practical-sdr
najarvg 16 hours ago
Astonishing! Thank you very much for sharing.. This sentence really stuck out for me - "I was proud! I was tired! I was amazed that all those things I received are all around us, everywhere, all at once – if you know where to look. :O"
dang 12 hours ago
Related. Others?

Fifty Things you can do with a Software Defined Radio - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39728153 - March 2024 (40 comments)

codebude 20 minutes ago
What a great write. I fiddled around with RTL SDRs years ago, but never got so far.
ortusdux 15 hours ago
I've been wanting to experiment with SDR triangulation. There are some off the shelf options, but I think it would be fun to cobble something together using dongles.

https://www.crowdsupply.com/krakenrf/krakensdr

colanderman 14 hours ago
https://khanfar-spectrum-analyzer.web.app/ also has some phase-based direction-finding software and upcoming hardware.

For triangulation though, if you have a reference signal at a known location, TDoA (time difference of arrival) requires less hardware (just a single receiver at each location, e.g. an RTL-SDR). I don't know of any open-source software which does that though I've been slowly building some for my own use (it's pretty janky at the moment).

advy 5 hours ago
You could perhaps compare notes with the author of [0] who did manage to achieve multilateration with rtl-sdrs using TDoA.

[0] https://jenda.hrach.eu/

colanderman 2 hours ago
Oh wow that's a fantastic resource thank you!
ortusdux 8 hours ago
I want to experiment with stationary receivers around the perimeter of my property. It would be fun to document and pinpoint every RF source on my land, but I'd settle for being able to reliably find my dog.
_whiteCaps_ 14 hours ago
One of the people in my local radio club did a demonstration of tracking down a commercial operation using amateur radio frequencies with the KrakenSDR. It's very impressive. I think the timing would be much more difficult using off the shelf dongles.
LVB 1 hour ago
>Klaus, Bernd, Jürgen and Horst were talking about antennas, relays, and Windows XP!

I was last active on HAM bands about 15 years ago, but that sounds about right. And the weather.

schoen 11 hours ago
Is it clear that the aviation or maritime communications are "not meant for the public" within the meaning of the German law?

I'm amazed to see that liveatc.net has no receivers in Germany, maybe a sign that other people also have this interpretation of the legislation?

nerdsniper 10 hours ago
What's even more interesting about this is that anyone flying their own personal plane would generally be expected to be listening to others on their same frequency (and sometimes this helps prevent accidents). So in that sense, the ATC messages are "meant for any member of the public who happens to be flying a plane nearby".

But apparently the government of Germany doesn't quite conclude the same thing from that which I do.

Similarly, the government of Germany (apparently?) seem to make the distinction that decoding signals from a neighbors IoT device is not restricted like other "messages not meant for the general public", so honestly there's probably a lot of nuance that a naive outsider is completely missing.

winkelmann 4 hours ago
Warning: My German legalese isn't very good and this is not legal advice. I unfortunately know very little about how the German court system works and where to look up stuff.

The law[1] is worded like this:

> (1) Mit einer Funkanlage (§ 3 Absatz 1 Nummer 1 des Funkanlagengesetzes) dürfen nur solche Nachrichten abgehört oder in vergleichbarer Weise zur Kenntnis genommen werden, die für den Betreiber der Funkanlage, für Funkamateure im Sinne des § 2 Nummer 1 des Amateurfunkgesetzes, für die Allgemeinheit oder für einen unbestimmten Personenkreis bestimmt sind.

The law basically says that you may only listen to (or take note of in comparable way[2]) messages that are:

1. For you, the operator

2. For amateur radio operators according to the Amateurfunkgesetz

3. For the general public

4. For an indeterminate group of persons (I think that's an accurate translation?)

For me, a big question regarding aviation and marine traffic monitoring is what "unbestimmten Personenkreis"/"indeterminate group of persons" actually means. Since "die Allgemeinheit"/"the general public" is listed separately, I'd assume it's a distinct group from that, and to me the previous commenter's "meant for any member of the public who happens to be flying a plane nearby" sounds like it could fit that description. I'd argue, for example, that police radio is for a "determinate" group of persons, police officers and dispatchers working for the government, whereas aviation and maritime traffic is an "indeterminate" group of people, people working for all sorts of airlines, shipping companies, recreational pilots/boaters, who happen to be around the same area.

If anyone has any links to cases where this law was tried in relation to aviation or maritime communications, please share them, I have been struggling to figure out where to look for this stuff, on top of that, the law was also renamed or moved around, which makes it extra confusing.

[1] https://dejure.org/gesetze/TDDDG/5.html

[2] Might be related to this weird ruling, where a judge in a case about some ADS-B receiver decided that it was ok because rendering the position of aircraft wasn't "listening to" (as in, literally hearing) the traffic: https://openjur.de/u/130555.html - This decision is probably moot now, due the addition of "take note of in comparable way". The judge briefly mentions that actually listening to the traffic could be violating the law, but I am not sure if this point was ever properly litigated.

coretx 6 hours ago
Germany signed the Rome treaty so you can legally ignore that bullshit law.
alright2565 16 hours ago
This page was very slow to load for me, probably partly because it's being hugged by HN. But it would help a lot if images had the `loading="lazy"` attribute, and if they were compressed to about ~100KiB each instead.
Mountain_Skies 15 hours ago
Hope they have an unlimited bandwidth plan. I bailed out at about #20, which is unfortunate because it's otherwise a nice list. I'm going to assume 51. Get a Free Kia, isn't part of it.
sandos 14 hours ago
I always forget that the US still has bandwidth caps.. something which has never really existed where I live for fixed broadband.
Mountain_Skies 11 hours ago
Server bandwidth wherever he's hosted.
esseph 11 hours ago
I don't think it's very common anymore.
coretx 6 hours ago
"Listening to “messages not meant for the general public” is not allowed in Germany, so of course I didn’t do that"

The treaty of Rome says otherwise. Germans too are free to receive.

BobbyTables2 4 hours ago
How does one use random wire antenna in an urban area!

Tried once and just got huge amount of noise all over HF. Except for a few strong shortwave and Amateur Radio stations, the rest of HF was pretty useless.

Even had decent ground plane and tuned it.

CamperBob2 4 hours ago
For HF, look at the technical articles by PA3WFM for the WebSDR at utwente.nl, especially this one: https://www.pa3fwm.nl/technotes/tn07.html

TL,DR: you probably don't want a random wire for HF reception, but either an E-field whip antenna like that one, or an H-field loop which will likely be larger and more expensive, but will have useful directional properties that the whip will not.

a1o 15 hours ago
Over a decade ago I played with SDR sharp and a tv dongle and got to listen to very cool stuff. I don’t know if SDR sharp still exists, I think it was closed source at the time but free. I remember one could use it to decode stuff and then map to virtual ports to redirect to other software that expected an input from specialized hardware like ship signals and stuff like that.
sharksauce 14 hours ago
There is SDR++ : https://www.sdrpp.org/
toomuchtodo 16 hours ago
fullstop 15 hours ago
I have been feeding ADSB data to public feeds for almost two years now: https://i.imgur.com/p9dRiVP.png

It runs on an Orange Pi Zero 3 SBC.

ComputerGuru 14 hours ago
People are commenting about issues loading the images leading to them abandoning reading the article. Here is a fully cached copy of TFA, but note that the videos (and images, but especially the videos) load _really_ slowly https://web.archive.org/web/20240317122351/https://blinry.or... (but they do load if you wait long enough).
rlmineing_dead 15 hours ago
I have a USRP B210 and its great fun for many things. One of my favorite things to do is create a small 2G GSM base station to use old phones!
fgbarben 15 hours ago
You say this as if it's an easy thing anybody might do -- like putting flowers in a vase in the kitchen. Isn't it pretty complicated?
Interesco 14 hours ago
I cant speak to 2G networks, but 5G (and 4G) are amazingly simple to get started using OpenAirInterface. With a USRP B210 I had a 5G network running from a bare Ubuntu install in under 30 minutes. I used a smartphone and some cheap (blank, user-writable) SIM cards to connect and test it.
film42 16 hours ago
Very cool post. If Jeff Geerling is reading this, I wouldn't mind watching a video on each of these ;)
_whiteCaps_ 14 hours ago
Check out saveitforparts on youtube, he does lots of this stuff.
mindcrime 14 hours ago
Gabe just quit his dayjob to go full-time on SaveItForParts, so hopefully we'll be seeing even more cool stuff in the near future. Me personally, I'm hoping for a collab between him and Jeff. They've had some interaction already (Jeff donated Gabe a spare computer he had lying around) so maybe... That would be epic if it did happen.
_whiteCaps_ 12 hours ago
They already did a quick collab with Jeff's PIs in space video. But I'm definitely hoping for more.
mindcrime 12 hours ago
Aaah. I haven't watched that one yet, so I didn't even know. I'll definitely check that out later today.
ge96 15 hours ago
Like 13 years ago when I was doing FPV I remember soldering my own skew-planar/quadrifilar antennas with bendable wire ha, the photo of the short yellow dipole reminded me of it. I think it's a dipole or double-dipole not sure.

edit: I think it's just a dipole

15 hours ago
taeric 11 hours ago
Kudos on convincing me to try one of these dongles. This looks like a ridiculously fun project to do with the kids.
lpln3452 14 hours ago
Nice blog. It would be great if there was a table of contents to see everything at a glance.
privatelypublic 16 hours ago
Pictures are loading at a crawl, had to bail because the layout kept rerendering.

Looks like hug of death strikes again!

clueless 15 hours ago
more than 15 years ago I got a chance to play with gnu radio and back then it was hailed as the next big industry.. fast forward, and beyond the hacking community (and the hobbyist), it still has not taken over.
NoiseBert69 15 hours ago
It's super popular within the RF industry.

But for the normal users - to be honest - most topics are too heavy on complex math. And there's no way to avoid it if you want results.

Most advanced radio stuff much more complicate than checking out a repo from GitHub and compiling it.

dummydummy1234 15 hours ago
My impression is that gnuradio is fine for prototyping/poc, but has issues in its design when you try and run production workloads with more complex workflows (ie, writing custom Mac layers/ workflows that involve heavy feedback, etc. you end up having to do a a lot of hacking around with the message passing infrastructure).

That being said last I used it extensively was v3 so maybe v4 is better. Did they get rid of thread per block and allow you to have a single thread service a sub signal chain? I remember that the number of context switches between threads, and balancing latency vs buffer sizes was a pain in the rear.

structural 14 hours ago
The threading model is still difficult, and it's still enough slower that thinking you're going to be comparable to custom silicon that's been designed for a particular protocol is silly.

It's great fun for doing signal analysis, but I'd never want to try and implement a full-duplex communication system in production with it.

ronsor 11 hours ago
If I were doing SDR-based comms in production, a custom C (or C++) application would be on the table, and nothing else.
amelius 15 hours ago
Is there SDR for the GHz range of signals used by modern equipment?
mindcrime 13 hours ago
FWIW, if you have an SDR that doesn't work with the frequency you want to work with, you may be able to use an up-converter or down-converter in front of the SDR to shift the frequency enough to work. There are ones like the Ham It Up[1], etc. that may be appropriate depending on the circumstances. Or you could possibly build your own.

[1]: https://www.nooelec.com/store/sdr/sdr-addons/ham-it-up.html

rlmineing_dead 15 hours ago
You can get an AD9363 clone of the USRP b210 online for like, 300 USD?

The AD9363 stock is only supposed to be 325mhz to 3.8ghz but stuff like the plutoSDR which uses it manages to get the transceiver all the way from 70mhz to 6ghz like the more expensive AD9361 used in the real USRP B210s

Benefit is you can transmit stuff too, not just receive unlike the RTL-SDR which is RX only

Bender 15 hours ago
Is there anything like this that can go down to 15 MHz or lower? including transmit and several analog modes of modulation USB LSB NFM WFM AM CW at least
9 hours ago
kavouras 15 hours ago
If I understand what you're saying, you can do any modulation scheme with sdr, it doesnt depend on the model
Bender 15 hours ago
Groovy. Are there any limiting factors such as processor speed and what is the best software that does it all on Linux? I have no idea what ratio of magic smoke is in the software vs. ratio of magic smoke is in the hardware.
pests 11 hours ago
The output of a usb radio like this is a set of IQ values which is the raw data from the ADC. The amount of values (samples) you get is device dependent and also limited by your interface. The RTL SDR 4 over usb can do up to 2.4-3.5MHz. The ADC on that device is 8 bit so you will get two 8 bit, IQ numbers per sample.

You can tune into remote SDR’s people set up to work with this data without having your own device or download recordings others have made.

It is this raw sample data that you then demodulate according to whatever scheme required on the PC side.

A great resource I found was pysdr.org. I had absolutely no background in RF and very little python experience but that guide explains everything from the ground up from how the IQ samples are physically generated and read in an antenna, all the modulation schemes you mentioned, and how to code useful things with the various devices. No affiliation but a great resource.

megaloblasto 15 hours ago
HackRF One can go up to 6GHz ($400 new or $100 on alibaba for a similar device). Any higher frequency than that you'll be paying thousands.
boneitis 6 hours ago
for anyone reading this actually interested, just FYI an improved model "HackRF Pro" is due for release in the next month or so, is backwards-compatible, and is what will come in at that $400 price tag.

years ago, there used to be a very abundant market for used or chinese clone HackRF One units, but i haven't been able to find any these days.

rlmineing_dead 15 hours ago
Yeah I dont know any SDR above 6GHZ but also other than mmwave 5G I also dont know much radio that is above 6Ghz in general
structural 14 hours ago
Quite a few radar systems are in the 8-10GHz range and satellite communications just above that. The general idea when using a SDR for these things is to have a separate frequency converter & amplifier at the antenna feed itself, then have an intermediate frequency <6GHz fed via cable to the SDR. Tends to be much easier and cheaper this way.
esseph 11 hours ago
amelius 15 hours ago
Looks cool, except it uses USB2 which seems limiting in view of bandwidth.
ux266478 6 hours ago
480 Mbps is plenty for low GHz signals. 1GHz gives you 20MHz to play with, which turns into about ~100 Mbps max. A 6GHz signal pulling out all the stops will give you at ~1.6Gbps, but if you're dealing with data that extreme you're barking up the wrong tree with a cheap SDR like the HackRF.
15 hours ago
esseph 11 hours ago
"modern equipment" uses all KINDS of different frequencies, so that statement doesn't mean anything :/
zahirbmirza 13 hours ago
Kudos! I needed a break from no.24 and am looking forward to reading the remaining uses. Awesome article and resource. Thank you.
tbphp 3 hours ago
[dead]
bcjdjsndon 15 hours ago
[dead]
Junnn 15 hours ago
wow